Requirements Gathering for a Payment Processing API

1. Stakeholder Identification

  • Product Owner
  • Developers (Backend, Frontend)
  • QA Team
  • Security Team
  • External partners (e.g., payment gateways)

2. Business Goals

  • Enable secure and fast processing of customer payments.
  • Support multiple payment methods (credit cards, PayPal, etc.).
  • Ensure compliance with PCI-DSS security standards.
  • Provide real-time payment status updates.

3. Functional Requirements

IDRequirement DescriptionPriorityNotes
FR1API must allow creating a payment transactionHighInput: amount, currency, payment method, user ID
FR2API must support retrieving the status of a transactionHighOutput: pending, completed, failed
FR3API must support refunding a transactionMediumRefund amount can be partial or full
FR4API must validate payment details before processingHighValidate card number, expiry, CVV
FR5API must log all payment attempts for audit purposesHighLogs must be stored securely
FR6API should support pagination when listing transactionsLowSupport page size and page number

4. Non-Functional Requirements

IDRequirement DescriptionPriorityNotes
NFR1API must respond within 2 seconds for 95% of requestsHighPerformance benchmark
NFR2API must be available 99.9% of the timeHighHigh availability required
NFR3API must use HTTPS for all communicationsHighSecurity requirement
NFR4API keys must be used for authenticationHighSupport OAuth 2.0
NFR5API must be scalable to handle 1000 concurrent requestsMediumPrepare for peak loads

5. Data Requirements

  • Payment transaction data fields: transaction_id, user_id, amount, currency, payment_method, status, timestamp, refund_status.
  • Sensitive data (card info) should not be stored directly.
  • Logs must include request IP, timestamp, and transaction outcome.

6. Constraints

  • Must integrate with external payment gateway X.
  • Must comply with PCI-DSS standards.
  • Limited development time: 8 weeks.

7. User Stories (Example)

  • As a merchant, I want to create a payment transaction so that I can charge a customer.
  • As a system admin, I want to view the status of any transaction to monitor processing.
  • As a user, I want to refund a payment if necessary.

8. Questions for Stakeholders

  • Which payment methods should be prioritized?
  • What level of detail is required in error responses?
  • Are there any regional compliance rules for payments?

If you’d like, I can help you draft this for your specific API project or break down any part into more detail!

4.1-mini

You said:

example of requirements gathering analysis and validation for information security

ChatGPT said:

Absolutely! Here’s an example illustrating requirements gathering, analysis, and validation specifically for an Information Security project, such as implementing a secure access control system for an enterprise.


Example: Requirements Gathering, Analysis, and Validation for Information Security


1. Requirements Gathering

Stakeholders:

  • Chief Information Security Officer (CISO)
  • IT Security Team
  • Compliance Officer
  • System Administrators
  • End-users

Business Context:

  • The company needs to protect sensitive data and systems from unauthorized access.
  • Must comply with GDPR, HIPAA, or other relevant regulations.
  • Reduce risk of data breaches and insider threats.

Collected Requirements:

IDRequirement DescriptionSource/Stakeholder
IS1Implement role-based access control (RBAC) to limit user permissionsCISO, IT Security Team
IS2Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all remote accessCompliance Officer
IS3All user access events must be logged and monitored in real-timeIT Security Team
IS4Passwords must meet complexity and expiration policiesSystem Admin
IS5System must encrypt sensitive data at rest and in transitCompliance Officer
IS6System must automatically lock user accounts after 5 failed login attemptsIT Security Team

2. Requirements Analysis

  • Categorize requirements: Security controls, compliance, usability, monitoring.
  • Identify dependencies:
    • MFA depends on existing authentication systems.
    • Encryption requires key management infrastructure.
  • Assess feasibility:
    • Review current systems to see if RBAC can be integrated or requires new platform.
    • Determine resources for logging and real-time monitoring tools.
  • Prioritize:
    • Critical: MFA, encryption, access logs.
    • Important: Account lockout, password policies.
    • Lower: Usability improvements.
  • Conflict resolution:
    • Usability vs security: MFA might cause friction, consider adaptive authentication.
    • Logging volume vs storage costs: Balance log retention periods.

3. Requirements Validation

  • Review sessions with stakeholders to confirm:
    • RBAC roles and permissions are well-defined and reflect business needs.
    • MFA methods (SMS, app-based tokens) are acceptable and feasible.
    • Logging includes all necessary events and meets compliance.
    • Encryption standards align with industry best practices (AES-256, TLS 1.2+).
  • Prototyping or Proof of Concept (PoC):
    • Test MFA implementation on a pilot group.
    • Validate logging and alerting with simulated attacks.
  • Traceability matrix:
    • Map requirements to business goals, compliance requirements, and design specifications.
  • Verification criteria:
    • Define clear success measures, e.g., MFA enabled for 100% of remote users by launch.
    • Automated alerts triggered within 1 minute of suspicious activity.

Summary Table

Requirement IDValidated ByValidation MethodOutcome/Status
IS1CISO, IT Security TeamReview meeting, documentationApproved
IS2Compliance Officer, UsersPoC test, user feedbackApproved with adjustments
IS3IT Security TeamLog audit, simulated attacksApproved
IS4System AdminPolicy review, test password resetsApproved
IS5Compliance OfficerSecurity audit, encryption testsApproved
IS6IT Security TeamTest account lockout policyApproved